Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31929768›Full record

ArticleActa acustica united with acustica : the journal of the European Acoustics Association (EEIG)

A Model for Statistical Regularity Extraction from Dynamic Sounds.

Benjamin Skerritt-Davis, Mounya Elhilali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta acustica united with acustica : the journal of the European Acoustics Association (EEIG). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring surprisal in sound sequences.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Article
  2. Neural Encoding of Auditory Statistics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 2024 IEEE 5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds. International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds (5th : 2024 : Erlangen, Germany)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin Skerritt-DavisJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. mounya@jhu.edu.
Mounya ElhilaliJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. mounya@jhu.edu.

Funding

Multiscale modeling of the cocktail party problemU01AG058532 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Smart stethoscope for monitoring and diagnosis of lung diseasesR01HL133043 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133043NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand our surroundings, we effortlessly parse our sound environment into sound sources, extracting invariant information-or regularities-over time to build an internal representation of the world around us. Previous experimental work has shown the brain is sensitive to many types of regularities in sound, but theoretical models that capture underlying principles of regularity tracking across diverse sequence structures have been few and far between. Existing efforts often focus on sound patterns rather the stochastic nature of sequences. In the current study, we employ a perceptual model for regularity extraction based on a Bayesian framework that posits the brain collects statistical information over time. We show this model can be used to simulate various results from the literature with stimuli exhibiting a wide range of predictability. This model can provide a useful tool for both interpreting existing experimental results under a unified model and providing predictions for new ones using more complex stimuli.

Identifiers

PMID31929768
PMCPMC6953992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.