Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31929740›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2020

Protective Effects of Foam Rolling against Inflammation and Notexin Induced Muscle Damage in Rats.

Ana Pablos, Diego Ceca, Adrián Jorda, Pilar Rivera, Carlos Colmena, Laura Elvira, Francisco M Martínez-Arnau, Soraya L Valles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana PablosFaculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain.
Diego CecaDepartment of Education, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Adrián JordaDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pilar RiveraDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos ColmenaDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Laura ElviraFaculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco M Martínez-ArnauFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain.
Soraya L VallesDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that high-intensity exercise can cause inflammation and damage in muscle tissue, and in recent years, physical therapists and fitness professionals have begun to use foam rolling as a recovery method to improve performance. Despite the lack of basic science studies to support or refute the efficacy of foam rolling, the technique is very widely used in the sports world. In this respect, we investigated whether foam rolling could attenuate muscle damage and inflammation. Female Wistar rats were assigned to control (C), foam rolling (FR), notexin without foam rolling (N) and notexin with foam rolling (NFR) groups. A 4.5 x 2 cm foam roller was used to massage their hind legs (two 60-second repetitions twice a day for 3 days). Motor function tests (Balance Beam Test and Grip strength) were used. We detected an increase in time and foot faults when crossing a beam in the N group compared to C and FR rats. In contrast, a significant decrease was detected in both tests in NFR compared to N rats. Muscle power was measured with a grip strength test and better performance was detected in NFR rats compared to N rats. Furthermore, an increase of pro-inflammatory proteins was noted in the N group, while there was a decrease in the NFR group. On the contrary, an increase in PPAR-γ (anti-inflammatory protein) in the NFR group compared to the N group demonstrates the anti-inflammatory properties of the foam rolling technique. In summary, applying foam rolling after damage has benefits such as an increase in anti-inflammatory proteins and a reduction of pro-inflammatory proteins, resulting in muscle recovery and better performance.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElapid VenomsHumansInflammationInterleukin-1MassageMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical Conditioning, AnimalPhysical TherapistsRange of Motion, ArticularRatsRats, WistarSportsElapid VenomsInterleukin-1notexinTumor Necrosis Factor-alphacell deathfoam rollinginflammationmuscle recoveryperformance

Identifiers

PMID31929740
PMCPMC6945557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.