Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31929722›Full record

ArticleBiological invasions2019

North American Douglas-fir (

Marcela van Loo, Desanka Lazic, Debojyoti Chakraborty, Hubert Hasenauer, Silvio Schüler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological invasions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcela van Loo1Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-2967
Desanka Lazic1Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Debojyoti Chakraborty2Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131 Vienna, Austria.
Hubert Hasenauer3Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter-Jordan Str. 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3469-4031
Silvio Schüler2Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0155-5692
Austrian Research Centre for Forests · ATUniversity of Vienna · ATBOKU University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 26504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic admixture and plasticity along with propagule pressure, large seed dispersal distances and fast adaptation support successful establishment and spread of introduced species outside their native range. Consequently, introductions may display climatic niche shifts in the introduced range. Douglas-fir, a controversial forest and ornamental conifer represented by two ecologically different and hybridising varieties, was transferred multiple times outside the native range in North America. Here, we compare climatic and genetic patterns of 38 native populations from North America with six old

Indexed as

Climate similarityDouglas-firFine-scale spatial genetic structureInter-varietal hybridisationNatural regenerationPopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID31929722
PMCPMC6936651
OpenAlexW2958085733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.