ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019
Effect of staining temperature on topical dual stain imaging of tissue specimens for tumor identification.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Evaluating Receptor-Specific Fresh Specimen Staining for Tumor Margin Detection in Clinical Breast Specimens.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
- TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the pursuit of reducing re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery, a dual probe specimen staining technique has emerged as a promising approach to identify positive margins during surgery. This approach generally involves staining the tissue with a fluorescent dye targeted to a biomarker of interest, such as a cell surface receptor, and an untargeted counterpart, imaging both dyes and using the two images together to compensate for instrumentation inhomogeneities and non-specific uptake. A growing body of literature suggests that this approach can effectively discriminate tumor and normal tissue in gross fresh specimens in reasonable timeframes. However, the robustness of the staining protocol is still under investigation as all parameters have not been fully evaluated. In this paper, we examine the effect of staining temperature on diagnostic performance. Tumor (overexpressing EGFR) and normal fresh specimens were stained at room temperature or 37 °C and diagnostic performance compared using area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. The results suggest that the use of Licor IRDye800CW-labeled anti-EGFR antibody and Licor IRdye680RD-labeled control antibody as the probe pair is not significantly affected by staining temperature, in contrast to our experience with quantum-dot labeled antibodies. The robustness of the technique using these stains is reassuring and simplifies the staining protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.