Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31929240›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Does minimal invasive cardiac surgery reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation?

Maria Maimari, Nikolaos G Baikoussis, Stelios Gaitanakis, Anna Dalipi-Triantafillou, Andreas Katsaros, Charilaos Kantsos, Vasileios Lozos, Konstantinos Triantafillou

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A comparative study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless biological versus mechanical prostheses.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria MaimariDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos G BaikoussisDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Stelios GaitanakisDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anna Dalipi-TriantafillouDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Andreas KatsarosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Charilaos KantsosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Vasileios LozosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos TriantafillouDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common post-operative complication and tends to be the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. The etiology and risk factors for post-operative AF are poorly understood, but older age, large left atrium, diffuse coronary artery disease, a history of AF paroxysms and in general, pre-existing cardiac conditions that cause restricting and susceptibility towards inflammation have been consistently linked with post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). It has been traditionally thought that post-operative AF is transient, well-tolerated, benign to the patient and self-limiting complication of cardiac surgery that was temporary and easily treated. However, recent evidence suggests that POAF may be more "malignant" than previously thought, associated with follow-up mortality and morbidity. Several minimally invasive approaches, including the right parasternal approach, upper and lower mini-sternotomy (MS), V-shaped, Z-shaped, inverse-T, J-, reverse-C and reverse-L partial MS, transverse sternotomy and right mini-thoracotomy, have been developed for cardiac surgery operations since 1993 and have been associated with better outcomes and lower perioperative morbidity compared to full sternotomy (FS). The common goal of several minimally invasive approaches is to reduce invasiveness and surgical trauma. According to a statement from the American Heart Association (AHA), the term "minimally invasive" refers to a small chest wall incision that does not include a FS. This review is aimed to evaluate the use of minimally invasive techniques like mini-sternotomy, mini-thoracotomy and hybrid techniques versus conventional techniques which are used in cardiac surgery and to compare the frequency of post-operative AF and its effect on post-operative complications, morbidity and mortality, after cardiac surgery operations with FS versus cardiac surgery operations with the use of minimally invasive techniques.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac Surgical ProceduresHumansIncidenceMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAtrial fibrillationhybrid cardiac surgeryminimal invasive cardiac surgerymini sternotomyvalve surgery.

Identifiers

PMID31929240
PMCPMC7034196
OpenAlexW2999801958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.