ArticleJournal of environmental management2020
Development of efficient electroactive biofilm in urine-fed microbial fuel cell cascades for bioelectricity generation.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrifying waste: Lebanese olive cake as novel bioenergy substrate in microbial fuel cells.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Characteristics and driving factors of power generation performance in microbial fuel cells: an analysis based on the CNKI database.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2023Article
- Review
- Coproduction and enhancement of electricity and biobutanol using adsorption carrier solid-state fermentation.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- Microbial fuel cells and their electrified biofilms.Biofilm · 2021Article
- Impact of selected environmental factors on microbiome of the digestive tract of ruminants.BMC veterinary research · 2021Review
- Impact of Inoculum Type on the Microbial Community and Power Performance of Urine-Fed Microbial Fuel Cells.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Improving the power performance of urine-fed microbial fuel cells using PEDOT-PSS modified anodes.Applied energy · 2020Article
- Resilience and limitations of MFC anodic community when exposed to antibacterial agents.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Optimisation of the internal structure of ceramic membranes for electricity production in urine-fed microbial fuel cells.Journal of power sources · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology harnesses the potential of some naturally occurring bacteria for electricity generation. Digested sludge is commonly used as the inoculum to initiate the process. There are, however, health hazards and practical issues associated with the use of digested sludge depending on its origin as well as the location for system deployment. This work reports the development of an efficient electroactive bacterial community within ceramic-based MFCs fed with human urine in the absence of sludge inoculum. The results show the development of a uniform bacterial community with power output levels equal to or higher than those generated from MFCs inoculated with sludge. In this case, the power generation begins within 2 days of the experimental set-up, compared to about 5 days in some sludge-inoculated MFCs, thus significantly reducing the start-up time. The metagenomics analysis of the successfully formed electroactive biofilm (EAB) shows significant shifts between the microbial ecology of the feeding material (fresh urine) and the developed anodic biofilm. A total of 21 bacteria genera were detected in the urine feedstock whilst up to 35 different genera were recorded in the developed biofilm. Members of Pseudomonas (18%) and Anaerolineaceae (17%) dominate the bacterial community of the fresh urine feed while members of Burkholderiaceae (up to 50%) and Tissierella (up to 29%) dominate the anodic EAB. These results highlight a significant shift in the bacterial community of the feedstock towards a selection and adaptation required for the various electrochemical reactions essential for survival through power generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.