Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928642›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Design, Implementation, and in Vivo Validation of a Novel Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy System.

Eric S Diffenderfer, Ioannis I Verginadis, Michele M Kim, Khayrullo Shoniyozov, Anastasia Velalopoulou, Denisa Goia, Mary Putt, Sarah Hagan, Stephen Avery, Kevin Teo and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
33.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 454 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Volumetric FLASH dosimetryPhysics in medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Musculoskeletal and Marrow Sparing With Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy in Juvenile Mice.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric S DiffenderferDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ioannis I VerginadisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michele M KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Khayrullo ShoniyozovDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anastasia VelalopoulouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Denisa GoiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mary PuttDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sarah HaganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen AveryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kevin TeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Wei ZouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alexander LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Samuel Swisher-McClureDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cameron KochDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann R KennedyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Andy MinnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amit MaityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Theresa M BuschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lei DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Costas KoumenisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Costas.Koumenis@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
James MetzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Keith A CengelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Cengel@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

SARRP 200 Small animal radiation research platformS10RR026587 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KOUMENIS, CONSTANTINOS · 2010 to 2010
$499k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent studies suggest that ultrahigh-dose-rate, "FLASH," electron radiation therapy (RT) decreases normal tissue damage while maintaining tumor response compared with conventional dose rate RT. Here, we describe a novel RT apparatus that delivers FLASH proton RT (PRT) using double scattered protons with computed tomography guidance and provide the first report of proton FLASH RT-mediated normal tissue radioprotection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Absolute dose was measured at multiple depths in solid water and validated against an absolute integral charge measurement using a Faraday cup. Real-time dose rate was obtained using a NaI detector to measure prompt gamma rays. The effect of FLASH versus standard dose rate PRT on tumors and normal tissues was measured using pancreatic flank tumors (MH641905) derived from the KPC autochthonous PanCa model in syngeneic C57BL/6J mice with analysis of fibrosis and stem cell repopulation in small intestine after abdominal irradiation.

resultsThe double scattering and collimation apparatus was dosimetrically validated with dose rates of 78 ± 9 Gy per second and 0.9 ± 0.08 Gy per second for the FLASH and standard PRT. Whole abdominal FLASH PRT at 15 Gy significantly reduced the loss of proliferating cells in intestinal crypts compared with standard PRT. Studies with local intestinal irradiation at 18 Gy revealed a reduction to near baseline levels of intestinal fibrosis for FLASH-PRT compared with standard PRT. Despite this difference, FLASH-PRT did not demonstrate tumor radioprotection in MH641905 pancreatic cancer flank tumors after 12 or 18 Gy irradiation.

conclusionsWe have designed and dosimetrically validated a FLASH-PRT system with accurate control of beam flux on a millisecond time scale and online monitoring of the integral and dose delivery time structure. Using this system, we found that FLASH-PRT decreases acute cell loss and late fibrosis after whole-abdomen and focal intestinal RT, whereas tumor growth inhibition is preserved between the 2 modalities.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnimalsCell ProliferationEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleFibrosisGamma RaysIntestine, SmallMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPancreatic NeoplasmsProton TherapyRadiation Injuries, Experimental

Identifiers

PMID31928642
PMCPMC7325740
OpenAlexW3000135998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.