Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928534›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Research priorities of women at risk for preterm birth: findings and a call to action.

Linda S Franck, Monica R McLemore, Shanell Williams, Kathryn Millar, Anastasia Y Gordon, Schyneida Williams, Nakia Woods, Lisa Edwards, Tania Pacheco, Artie Padilla and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations between early marriage and preterm delivery: Evidence from lowland Nepal.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Linda S FranckCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. linda.franck@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-9181
Monica R McLemoreCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shanell WilliamsCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kathryn MillarCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anastasia Y GordonSan Francisco Black Infant Health (formerly), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Schyneida WilliamsHomeless Prenatal Program (formerly), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nakia WoodsOakland Best Babies Zone (formerly), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lisa EdwardsBlack Wellness Council, Oakland, CA, USA.
Tania PachecoCalifornia State University, Fresno, CA, USA.
Artie PadillaFresno Every Neighborhood Partnership, Fresno, CA, USA.
Fanta NelsonFresno County Black Infant Health, Fresno, CA, USA.
Larry RandCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCalifornia State University, Fresno · USFresno County Office of Education · USNeighborhood House · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional hierarchical approaches to research give privilege to small groups with decision-making power, without direct input from those with lived experience of illness who bear the burden of disease. A Research Justice framework values the expertise of patients and communities as well as their power in creating knowledge and in decisions about what research is conducted. Preterm birth has persisted at epidemic levels in the United States for decades and disproportionately affects women of color, especially Black women. Women of color have not been included in setting the agenda regarding preterm birth research.

methodsWe used the Research Priorities of Affected Communities protocol to elicit and prioritize potential research questions and topics directly from women of color living in three communities that experience disproportionately high rates of preterm birth. Women participated in two focus group sessions, first describing their healthcare experiences and generating lists of uncertainties about their health and/or healthcare during pregnancy. Women then participated in consensus activities to achieve 'top-priority' research questions and topic lists. The priority research questions and topics produced by each group were examined within and across the three regions for similarities and differences.

resultsFifty-four women participated in seven groups (14 sessions) and generated 375 researchable questions, clustered within 22 topics and four overarching themes: Maternal Health and Care Before, During, and After Pregnancy; Newborn Health and Care of the Preterm Baby; Understanding Stress and Interventions to Prevent or Reduce Stress; and Interpersonal and Structural Health Inequities. The questions and topics represent a wide range of research domains, from basic science, translational, clinical, health and social care delivery to policy and economic research. There were many similarities and some unique differences in the questions, topics and priorities across the regions.

conclusionsThese findings can be used to design and fund research addressing unanswered questions that matter most to women at high risk for preterm birth. Investigators and funders are strongly encouraged to incorporate women at the front lines of the preterm birth epidemic in research design and funding decisions, and more broadly, to advance methods to deepen healthcare research partnerships with affected communities.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesObstetricsAdultBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Status DisparitiesHumansPregnancyPremature BirthResearchUnited StatesHealth disparitiesLived experiencePatient and public involvementPregnancy, preterm birthResearch justiceResearch priority settingWomen of color

Identifiers

PMID31928534
PMCPMC6956492
OpenAlexW3004131270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.