Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928512›Full record

Trial reportStroke2019

Observer Agreement on Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Salwa El-Tawil, Grant Mair, Xuya Huang, Eleni Sakka, Jeb Palmer, Ian Ford, Lalit Kalra, Joanna Wardlaw, Keith W Muir, Study Collaborators

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Salwa El-TawilFrom the Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland (S.E.-T., K.W.M.).
Grant MairDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, United Kingdom (G.M.).
Xuya HuangInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology (X.H.), University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Eleni SakkaDepartment of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (E.S., J.P.).
Jeb PalmerDepartment of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (E.S., J.P.).
Ian FordRobertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Lalit KalraDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (L.K.).
Joanna WardlawDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences and UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (J.W.).
Keith W MuirFrom the Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland (S.E.-T., K.W.M.).
Study Collaborators
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBNeurosciences Institute · USQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/17/01Department of Health 11/100/78Medical Research Council G0400069Medical Research Council G0902303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) provides potentially valuable information to guide treatment decisions in acute stroke. Assessment of interobserver reliability of CTP has, however, been limited to small, mostly single center studies. We performed a large, internet-based study to assess observer reliability of CTP interpretation in acute stroke. Methods- We selected 24 cases from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), ATTEST (Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis After Ischaemic Stroke), and POSH (Post Stroke Hyperglycaemia) studies to illustrate various perfusion abnormalities. For each case, observers were presented with noncontrast CT, maps of cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, mean transit time, delay time, and thresholded penumbra maps (dichotomized into penumbra and core), together with a short clinical vignette. Observers used a structured questionnaire to record presence of perfusion deficit, its extent compared with ischemic changes on noncontrast CT, and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score for noncontrast CT and CTP. All images were viewed, and responses were collected online. We assessed observer agreement with Krippendorff-α. Intraobserver agreement was assessed by inviting observers who reviewed all scans for a repeat review of 6 scans. Results- Fifty seven observers contributed to the study, with 27 observers reviewing all 24 scans and 17 observers contributing repeat readings. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for all CTP. Agreement was higher for perfusion maps compared with noncontrast CT and was higher for mean transit time, delay time, and penumbra map (Krippendorff-α =0.77, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively) compared with cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow (Krippendorff-α =0.69 and 0.62, respectively). Intraobserver agreement was fair to substantial in the majority of readers (Krippendorff-α ranged from 0.29 to 0.80). Conclusions- There are high levels of interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the interpretation of CTP in acute stroke, particularly of mean transit time, delay time, and penumbra maps.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyPerfusion ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCerebral Blood VolumeCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMiddle AgedStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTissue Plasminogen Activatorbraincerebral blood flowcomputed tomographypatient selectionperfusion

Identifiers

PMID31928512
PMCPMC6824508
OpenAlexW2975456609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.