Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928206›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2020

Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?

Gary L Beck Dallaghan, Cynthia H Ledford, Douglas Ander, John Spollen, Sherilyn Smith, Scott Graziano, Susan M Cox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gary L Beck DallaghanOffice of Medical Education, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8539-6969
Cynthia H LedfordDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5750-6163
Douglas AnderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-4585
John SpollenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sherilyn SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Scott GrazianoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-4006
Susan M CoxDepartment of Medical Education, Dell Medical School-The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-1858
Emory University · USLoyola University Chicago · USOakland University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician educators directing medical student programs face increasingly more complex challenges to ensure students receive appropriate preparation to care for patients. The Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE) defined expectations of and for clerkship directors in 2003. Since then, much has changed in medical education and health care.

methodsACE conducted a panel discussion at the 2016 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead conference, soliciting input on these expectations and the changing roles of clerkship directors. Using workshops as a cross-sectional study design, participants reacted to roles and responsibilities of clerkship directors identified in the literature using an audience response system and completing worksheets.

resultsThe participants represented different disciplines of medicine and ranged from clerkship directors to deans of curriculum. Essential clerkship director qualifications identified by participants included: enthusiasm, experience teaching, and clinical expertise. Essential tasks included grading and assessment and attention to accreditation standards. Participants felt clerkship directors need adequate resources, including budget oversight, full-time clerkship support, and dedicated time to be the clerkship director. To whom clerkship directors report was mixed. Clerkship directors look to their chair for career advice, and they also report to the dean to ensure educational standards are being met. Expectations to meet accreditation standards and provide exemplary educational experiences can be difficult to achieve if clerkship directors' time and resources are limited.

conclusionsParticipant responses indicated the need for a strong partnership between department chairs and the dean's office so that clerkship directors can fulfill their responsibilities. Our results indicate a need to ensure clerkship directors have the time and resources necessary to manage clinical medical student education in an increasingly complex health care environment. Further studies need to be conducted to obtain more precise data on the true amount of time they are given to do that role.

Indexed as

AccreditationClinical ClerkshipClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMotivationProfessional Roleaccreditationclinical clerkshipfacultymedical educationMedical students

Identifiers

PMID31928206
PMCPMC7006746
OpenAlexW2999226282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.