Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928194›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Vertebrate palaeophysiology.

Jorge Cubo, Adam K Huttenlocker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jorge CuboSorbonne Université, MNHN, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie-Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France.
Adam K HuttenlockerDepartment of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiology is a functional branch of the biological sciences, searching for general rules by which explanatory hypotheses are tested using experimental procedures, whereas palaeontology is a historical science dealing with the study of unique events where conclusions are drawn from congruence among independent lines of evidence. Vertebrate palaeophysiology bridges these disciplines by using experimental data obtained from extant organisms to infer physiological traits of extinct ones and to reconstruct how they evolved. The goal of this theme issue is to understand functional innovations imprinted on modern vertebrate clades, and how to infer (or 'retrodict') physiological capacities in their ancient relatives

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPaleontologyPhysiologyAnimalsFossilsPhylogenyVertebratesacid–base homeostasisgrowthpalaeopathophysiologyphospho-calcic metabolismrespiratory physiologythermometabolism

Identifiers

PMID31928194
PMCPMC7017429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.