ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Demonstration of the Anatomical Tachycardia Circuit in Sinoatrial Node Reentrant Tachycardia: Analysis Using the Entrainment Method.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atypical form of sinoatrial node reentrant tachycardia: Should the traditional diagnostic criteria be modified?HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
- Cryoablation for atrial tachycardia with cycle length variability originating from the vicinity of the sinus node.Journal of cardiology cases · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional functional anatomy of the human sinoatrial node for epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation.Heart rhythm · 2023Review
- Comparison of the catheter ablation outcome in patients between targeting the entrance and exit of the reentry circuit in verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular-node vicinity.Heart and vessels · 2021Article
- Structural and Functional Properties of Subsidiary Atrial Pacemakers in a Goat Model of Sinus Node Disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Demonstration of the Anatomical Tachycardia Circuit in Sinoatrial Node Reentrant Tachycardia: Analysis Using the Entrainment Method.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The anatomical tachycardia circuit of sinoatrial node reentrant tachycardia (SANRT) has not been well clarified. This study aimed to elucidate the tachycardia circuit of SANRT. Methods and Results Exit and entrance of the intranodal sinoatrial node conduction (I-SANC) of the reentry circuit were identified in 15 SANRT patients. After identifying the earliest atrial activation site (EAAS) during the tachycardia (EAAS-SANRT), rapid atrial pacing was delivered from multiple atrial sites to identify the entrainment pacing site where manifest entrainment and orthodromic capture of the EAAS-SANRT were demonstrated. Radiofrequency energy was then delivered starting at a site 2 cm proximal to the EAAS-SANRT in the direction of the entrainment pacing site and gradually advanced toward the EAAS-SANRT until tachycardia termination to localize the I-SANC entrance. The EAAS-SANRT was orthodromically captured by pacing delivered from the distal coronary sinus (n=7), high posteroseptal right atrium (n=2), low posteroseptal right atrium (n=2), low anterolateral right atrium (n=2), or coronary sinus ostium (n=2). Radiofrequency energy delivery to the entrance of the I-SANC, 10.4±2.8 mm away from the EAAS-SANRT, terminated tachycardia immediately after onset of energy delivery (3.4±2.3 seconds). The successful ablation site was located further from the EAAS during sinus rhythm (EAAS-sinus) than the EAAS-SANRT (12.8±4.5 versus 7.2±3.1 mm;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.