Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31928129›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2020

An Improved Methodology to Evaluate Cell and Molecular Signals in the Reparative Callus During Fracture Healing.

Anuradha Valiya Kambrath, Justin N Williams, Uma Sankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Signalling pathways underlying pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Recent Developments in the Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anuradha Valiya KambrathDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Justin N WilliamsDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Uma SankarDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

Comprehensive Training Program in Musculoskeletal ResearchT32AR065971 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ALEXANDER G ROBLING · 2015 to 2026
$4.4M
CaMKK2 Inhibition as a Dual-Action Bone Anabolic and Anti-Catabolic Therapy in OsteoporosisR01AR068332 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SANKAR, UMA · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068332NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR065971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 5% to 10% of all bone fractures do not heal completely, contributing to significant patient suffering and medical costs. Even in healthy individuals, fracture healing is associated with significant downtime and loss of productivity. However, no pharmacological treatments are currently available to promote efficient bone healing. A better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is crucial for developing novel therapies to hasten healing. The early reparative callus that forms around the site of bone injury is a fragile tissue consisting of shifting cell populations held together by loose connective tissue. The delicate callus is challenging to section and is vulnerable to disintegration during the harsh steps of immunostaining, namely, decalcification, deparaffinization, and antigen retrieval. Here, we describe an improved methodology for processing early-stage fracture calluses and immunofluorescence labeling of the sections to visualize the temporal (timing) and spatial (location) patterns of cellular and molecular events that regulate bone healing. This method has a short turnaround time from sample collection to microscopy as it does not require lengthy decalcification. It preserves the structural integrity of the fragile callus as the method does not entail deparaffinization or harsh methods of antigen retrieval. Our method can be adapted for high-throughput screening of drugs that promote efficacious bone healing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone DevelopmentBony CallusCartilageCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationFemurFluorescent DyesFracture HealingMaleMice, Inbred C57BLOptical ImagingOsteoblastsPhenazinesSignal TransductionTime FactorsFluorescent DyesPhenazinessafranine Tbone matrixcartilagechondrocytescryosectionfluorescence microscopyfracture callusimmunofluorescence labelingosteoblastssafranin O/fast green

Identifiers

PMID31928129
PMCPMC7045301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.