ArticleJournal of proteome research2020
Gain-Scanning for Protein Microarray Assays.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Paradigm for Targeting Challenging Targets: Advancing Technologies and Future Directions of Molecular Glue Degraders.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sensitive detection of HSP70 using a current-amplified biosensor based on antibody-loaded PS-AuNPs@Cys/Au modified ITO chip.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein microarrays consist of known proteins spotted onto solid substrates and are used to perform highly multivariate assessments of protein-binding interactions. Human protein arrays are routinely applied to pathogen detection, immune response biomarker profiling, and antibody specificity profiling. Here, we describe and demonstrate a new data processing procedure, gain-scan, in which data were acquired under multiple photomultiplier tube (PMT) settings, followed by data fitting with a power function model to estimate the incident light signals of the array spots. Data acquisition under multiple PMT settings solves the difficulty of determining the single optimal PMT gain setting and allows us to maximize the detection of low-intensity signals while avoiding the saturation of high-intensity ones at the same time. The gain-scan data acquisition and fitting also significantly lower the variances over the detectable range of signals and improve the linear data normalization. The performance of the proposed procedure was verified by analyzing the profiling data of both the human polyclonal serum samples and the monoclonal antibody samples with both technical replicates and biological replicates. We showed that the multigain power function was an appropriate model for describing data acquired under multiple PMT settings. The gain-scan fitting alone or in combination with the linear normalization could effectively reduce the technical variability of the array data and lead to better sample separability and more sensitive differential analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.