Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927795›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Absolute quantitation of microbes using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding: A rapid normalization of relative abundances by quantitative PCR targeting a 16S rRNA gene spike-in standard.

Olivier Zemb, Caroline S Achard, Jerome Hamelin, Marie-Léa De Almeida, Béatrice Gabinaud, Laurent Cauquil, Lisanne M G Verschuren, Jean-Jacques Godon

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observation Bias in Metabarcoding.Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nested PCR to optimizeMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivier ZembGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-5522
Caroline S AchardLallemand SAS, Blagnac cedex, France.
Jerome HamelinLBE, INRA, University of Montpellier, Narbonne, France.
Marie-Léa De AlmeidaGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Béatrice GabinaudGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Laurent CauquilGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Lisanne M G VerschurenTopigs Norsvin Research Center B.V., Beuningen, The Netherlands.
Jean-Jacques GodonLBE, INRA, University of Montpellier, Narbonne, France.
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRLallemand (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA gene is commonly used to characterize microbial communities, by estimating the relative abundance of microbes. Here, we present a method to retrieve the concentrations of the 16S rRNA gene per gram of any environmental sample using a synthetic standard in minuscule amounts (100 ppm to 1% of the 16S rRNA sequences) that is added to the sample before DNA extraction and quantified by two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) reactions. This allows normalizing by the initial microbial density, taking into account the DNA recovery yield. We quantified the internal standard and the total load of 16S rRNA genes by qPCR. The qPCR for the latter uses the exact same primers as those used for Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene to increase accuracy. We are able to calculate the absolute concentration of the species per gram of sample, taking into account the DNA recovery yield. This is crucial for an accurate estimate as the yield varied between 40% and 84%. This method avoids sacrificing a high proportion of the sequencing effort to quantify the internal standard. If sacrificing a part of the sequencing effort to the internal standard is acceptable, we however recommend that the internal standard accounts for 30% of the environmental 16S rRNA genes to avoid the PCR bias associated with rare phylotypes. The method proposed here was tested on a feces sample but can be applied more broadly on any environmental sample. This method offers a real improvement of metabarcoding of microbial communities since it makes the method quantitative with limited efforts.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicMetagenomeMetagenomicsBase SequenceBiodiversityEnvironmental MicrobiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneabsolute count datametabarcodingmicrobiomenormalizationspike-in

Identifiers

PMID31927795
PMCPMC7066463
OpenAlexW2999005973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.