Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927758›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2020

Basal ganglia lateralization in different types of reward.

Marie Arsalidou, Sagana Vijayarajah, Maksim Sharaev

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie ArsalidouDepartment of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. marie.arsalidou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9879-3894
Sagana VijayarajahDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maksim SharaevSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RUSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RUUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPGP-2014-00058Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-29-02518Russian Science Foundation 17-18-01047Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Skolkovo Biomedical Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward processing is a fundamental human activity. The basal ganglia are recognized for their role in reward processes; however, specific roles of the different nuclei (e.g., nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen and globus pallidus) remain unclear. Using quantitative meta-analyses we assessed whole-brain and basal ganglia specific contributions to money, erotic, and food reward processing. We analyzed data from 190 fMRI studies which reported stereotaxic coordinates of whole-brain, within-group results from healthy adult participants. Results showed concordance in overlapping and distinct cortical and sub-cortical brain regions as a function of reward type. Common to all reward types was concordance in basal ganglia nuclei, with distinct differences in hemispheric dominance and spatial extent in response to the different reward types. Food reward processing favored the right hemisphere; erotic rewards favored the right lateral globus pallidus and left caudate body. Money rewards engaged the basal ganglia bilaterally including its most anterior part, nucleus accumbens. We conclude by proposing a model of common reward processing in the basal ganglia and separate models for money, erotic, and food rewards.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaCaudate NucleusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPutamenRewardBasal gangliafMRIMeta-analysesRewardsStriatum

Identifiers

PMID31927758
OpenAlexW2998898826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.