Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927750›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2020

Sex-related differences in self-care behaviors of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Rosario Caruso, Paola Rebora, Michela Luciani, Stefania Di Mauro, Davide Ausili

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding barriers and facilitators of adherence to lifestyle changes in prediabetes: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7736-6209
Paola ReboraBicocca, Bioinformatics, Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0606-5852
Michela LucianiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy. michela.luciani@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7598-5658
Stefania Di MauroDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-5651
Davide AusiliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-6463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe sex-related differences in self-care; to identify determinants of self-care according to sex, and to investigate how sex interacts with the effect of clinical and socio-demographic variables on self-care in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).

methodsCross-sectional multicentre study with a consecutive sampling recruitment strategy, enrolling 540 adults with T2DM at six outpatient diabetes services. Clinical and socio-demographic variables were collected by medical records. Self-care maintenance, monitoring, management, and confidence were measured by the self-care of diabetes inventory.

resultsFemales reported higher disease prevention behaviors (P < 0.001), health-promoting behaviors (P < 0.001), body listening (P < 0.001), and symptom recognition (P = 0.010), but lower health-promoting exercise behaviors (P < 0.001). Determinants of self-care were different in male and female patients, where the role of task-specific self-care confidence predicted self-care monitoring (RR = 0.98; P < 0.001) and management (RR = 0.99; P < 0.001) among males, while persistence self-care confidence predicted self-care maintenance (RR = 0.97; P = 0.016) and management (RR = 0.99; P = 0.009) among females.

conclusionsMales and females differently perform self-care. Self-care confidence plays a different role predicting self-care behaviors in males and females. Future research should longitudinally describe self-care and its determinants in males and females with T2DM. Sex-specific self-care confidence interventions should be developed to improve self-care in male and female patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansMaleSelf CareSex CharacteristicsBehaviorSelf-careSelf-efficacySelf-managementSex characteristicsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.