Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927723›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2020

Neuroendocrine Effects of Lactation and Hormone-Gene-Environment Interactions.

Kirsten Gust, Christina Caccese, Amanda Larosa, Tuong-Vi Nguyen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fear of Childbirth Impairs Breastfeeding Success Independent of Mode of Birth.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Topical review: Lactation and use of DMTs in women with MS.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is Oxytocin "Nature's Medicine"?Pharmacological reviews · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsten GustReproductive Psychiatry Program, Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics-Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christina CacceseDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Amanda LarosaIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tuong-Vi NguyenReproductive Psychiatry Program, Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics-Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. tuong.v.nguyen@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2749-6942
McGill University Health Centre · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While correlational studies suggest that lactation may confer a certain level of protection from mental illness, this benefit is not uniformly expressed in all women who choose to breastfeed. We propose here that the neuroendocrine "resetting" induced by lactation may predispose toward positive affect states in a subset of hormone-sensitive mothers, with hormone-gene and hormone-environment interactions determining the ultimate psychological outcome. We find evidence to suggest that higher secretion of prolactin/oxytocin as well as lower secretion of vasopression/androgens in lactating mothers may protect against postpartum depression and anxiety, decrease levels of irritability, and optimize stress responses. On the other hand, while the abrupt withdrawal of estradiol/progesterone in the immediate postpartum period tends to be associated with adverse psychological outcomes, the chronic suppression of estrogens/progestogens induced by lactation may have antidepressant and anxiolytic effects over time. Finally, the hypo-cortisolemic state seen in lactating mothers appears to be associated with improved stress reactivity and circadian rhythms. We also discuss hormone-gene and hormone-environment interactions likely to modulate any potential psychological benefits related to lactation and focus on those factors that are either easy to screen for or known to be modifiable. In sum, neuroendocrine alterations induced by lactation may play a key role in determining reproductive psychiatric risk in a subset of hormone-sensitive women. Using these neuroendocrine factors as an individualized index of risk can help in devising targeted programs to support these women in pursuing lactation or, for those not able or willing, accessing psychological interventions in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionLactationAnimalsBreast FeedingFemaleHormonesHumansNeurosecretory SystemsRisk FactorsHormonesAndrogensBreastfeedingCortisolEstrogensPostpartum depressionProlactin

Identifiers

PMID31927723
OpenAlexW2999533830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.