Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927691›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2020

Air Pollution and Skin Aging.

Tamara Schikowski, Anke Hüls

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Ambient PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. SkinspanMayo Clinic proceedings · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression by coexposure to UVA and cigarette sidestream smoke and contribution of histone acetylation.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. An artificial intelligence powered study of enlarged facial pore prevalence on one million Chinese from different age groups and its correlation with environmental factors.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara SchikowskiIUF-Leibniz Institute for Environmental Medicine, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Anke HülsDepartments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. anke.huels@emory.edu.
Emory University · USLeibniz Institute of Environmental Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe evidence on the role of air pollution on skin aging has increased in recent years. The accumulating evidence is based on both, epidemiological and mechanistic studies. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the recent evidence on the impacts of air pollution on skin aging as well as identify knowledge gaps for future research. RECENT

findingsTraffic-related air pollution exposure (particulate matter (PM), soot and nitrogen dioxide (NO

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMaleNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterSkin AgingSootAir PollutantsNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterSootEnvironmental influencesNitrogen oxidesOzoneParticulate matterSootUltraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID31927691
OpenAlexW2999546834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.