Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927662›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2020

Assessing the health impact of interventions for baker's allergy and asthma in supermarket bakeries: a group randomised trial.

F M Al Badri, R Baatjies, Mohamed F Jeebhay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Occupational Respiratory Allergy to Flour in the Modern Era.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in occupational diseases - a systematic review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

F M Al BadriOccupational Medicine Division and Centre for Environmental & Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Room 4. 45, Fourth Level, Falmouth Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
R BaatjiesOccupational Medicine Division and Centre for Environmental & Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Room 4. 45, Fourth Level, Falmouth Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Mohamed F JeebhayOccupational Medicine Division and Centre for Environmental & Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Room 4. 45, Fourth Level, Falmouth Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa. Mohamed.Jeebhay@uct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-9193
University of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN SOUTH AFRICAD43TW000812 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINS, THOMAS G · 1996 to 2011
$2.6M
Research Training on Chronic Lung Diseases in Southern AfricaD43ES018744 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI IRUSEN, ELVISEGRAN MALCOLM, JEEBHAY, MOHAMED FAREED · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS 2 D43 TW000812-06FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000812NIEHS NIH HHS D43 ES018744South African National Research Foundation FA2006040700028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the impact of an intervention for baker's allergy and asthma in supermarket bakeries.

methodsA group randomised trial conducted in 31 bakeries (n = 337 bakers) that were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups (n = 244 bakers) and a control group (n = 93 bakers). Health data collected prior to and 1-year after the intervention included information obtained from an ECRHS questionnaire; tests for atopy and serum-specific IgE to cereal flours; fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Data from the two intervention groups were combined to form one intervention group for purposes of the statistical analysis.

resultsAt 1 year of follow-up, the incidence and level of decline of work-related ocular-nasal and chest symptoms, sensitisation status and elevated FeNO (FeNO > 25 ppb) was similar in both intervention and control groups. The mean FeNO difference was also similar across both groups (2.2 ppb vs 1.7 ppb, p = 0.86). In those with FeNO > 25 ppb at baseline, the decline was greater in the intervention compared to control group (16.9 ppb vs 7.7 ppb, p = 0.24). Multivariate logistic regression models (adjusting for smoking, baseline sensitisation to cereal flour, baseline FeNO > 25 ppb) did not demonstrate an appreciable FeNO decline (≥ 10%) in the intervention compared to control group. However, stratification by the presence of work-related ocular-nasal symptoms in bakers at baseline demonstrated a significant FeNO decline (≥ 10%) in the intervention compared to the control group (OR 3.73, CI 1.22-11.42).

conclusionThis study demonstrates some evidence of an intervention effect on FeNO 1 year after an intervention, particularly in bakers with work-related ocular-nasal symptoms.

Indexed as

AdultAir Pollutants, Occupationalalpha-AmylasesAsthma, OccupationalEdible GrainFemaleFlourFood HandlingFood MarketsHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleMiddle AgedNitric OxideOccupational ExposureParticulate MatterAir Pollutants, Occupationalalpha-AmylasesImmunoglobulin ENitric OxideParticulate MatterAllergyAsthmaBakersExhaled nitric oxideWorkplace interventions

Identifiers

PMID31927662
PMCPMC7261635
OpenAlexW2999738886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.