Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927652›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Tigecycline for the treatment of patients with Clostridium difficile infection: an update of the clinical evidence.

Konstantinos S Kechagias, Stamatia Chorepsima, Nikolaos A Triarides, Matthew E Falagas

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Omadacycline andThe Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management ofEClinicalMedicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. AgainstToxins · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A Review of Therapies forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The tigecycline resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacilli.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstantinos S KechagiasAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
Stamatia ChorepsimaAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos A TriaridesAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
Matthew E FalagasAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece. m.falagas@aibs.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-2695
Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences · GRHenry Dunant Hospital · GRTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea in adult patients and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Apart from the standard treatment regimens, tigecycline has shown significant in vitro activity against C. difficile but data regarding its clinical impact remains controversial. The aim of this article is to update the evidence related to the clinical role of tigecycline against C. difficile.

methodsPubMed and Scopus databases were searched for relevant literature published from January 2015 to July 2018.

resultsSix retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective study, 1 case series, and 2 case reports provided data regarding the effectiveness of tigecycline against C. difficile and were included in our evaluation. Also, we performed a meta-analysis based on 186 patients (from 4 studies) that showed clinical cure 79% (95% CI 73.0-84.5%).

conclusionDespite the heterogeneity of the included studies and the small number of patients, the available evidence suggests that tigecycline might be considered as a potential therapeutic option for patients with CDIs, especially in severe cases.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsHumansTigecyclineTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsTigecyclineClostridium difficileGlycylcyclinesSevere infectionTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID31927652
OpenAlexW3000369416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.