ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2020
The Challenges and Opportunities of Classifying Childhood Arthritis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-body MRI in arthritis.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Presentation of enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study in a pediatric and adult clinic.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Recent Updates in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Association between high mobility group box 1 protein and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective longitudinal study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2021Article
- Biological classification of childhood arthritis: roadmap to a molecular nomenclature.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
- Do geography and ethnicity play a role in juvenile Spondyloarthritis? A multi-center binational retrospective study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2021Article
- Clinical variability of the systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis course: literature review based on case series.Reumatologia · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChildhood arthritis is in need of a new system of classification, owing to deficiencies in the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria. We briefly review the history of classification of childhood arthritis, discuss the major criticisms of the current system, and highlight current initiatives to address those concerns. RECENT
findingsRecent studies in both pediatric and adult rheumatology into the biologic basis of disease as well as the clinical patterns of presentation have informed the efforts toward developing a new classification system. Several efforts are currently underway to improve the classification of childhood arthritis, most notably the project of the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO). This international alliance of pediatric rheumatologists has begun a 4-step process to create new classification criteria for childhood arthritis. They are currently on step 3 of the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31927650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.