Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927633›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2020

Eosinophilic Vasculitis.

Karen L Vega Villanueva, Luis R Espinoza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen L Vega VillanuevaSection of Rheumatology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Luis R EspinozaSection of Rheumatology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. lespin1@lsuhsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) represents a rare clinical entity, which is getting increasing attention and relevance in view of our better understanding and newer insights into its pathogenesis. Concomitantly better recognition and understanding of the immune pathophysiologic role of eosinophils provide a solid ground of their role on systemic inflammatory disorders and defense against infectious triggers, especially parasites. This review will focus on describing the physiopathology of eosinophils, as well as providing an in depth description of the natural history, clinical spectrum, and therapy of EGPA. RECENT

findingsSeveral studies have aimed at finding useful biomarkers to monitor disease activity, and reported data have shown that eotaxin 3, IL25, IL33, and some eicosanoids to be promising options. Regarding therapeutic advances, recently published studies have revealed the efficacy of mepolizumab during induction and maintenance of EGPA. Recently published data confirmed earlier studies that the use of azathioprine during the induction phase is of no benefit during long-term follow-up. In addition, data from the REOVAS study, which uses rituximab, is still ongoing and apparently with promising results. Eosinophils are involved in several systemic inflammatory disorders, and recent gathered data provide support for their role in triggering EGPA. Better understanding of its pathophysiology should generate newer insights into the pathogenesis, biomarkers of disease activity, and therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Churg-Strauss SyndromeBiomarkersEosinophilsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsBiomarkersImmunosuppressive AgentsBiomarkersEGPAEosinophilsHypereosinophilic syndromeMepolizumabRituximab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.