Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31927615›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2020

Rescue stenting versus medical care alone in refractory large vessel occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kévin Premat, Agnes Dechartres, Stéphanie Lenck, Eimad Shotar, Raphaël Le Bouc, Vincent Degos, Nader Sourour, Sonia Alamowitch, Yves Samson, Frédéric Clarençon

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. RESCUE-ICAS: Rationale and Study Design.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Acute intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke with underlying atherosclerosis: A two-center retrospective study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  6. RETRACTED: Rescue intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke (study).Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Determinants of day-1 stent patency following rescue intracranial stenting in failed intracranial thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Granulocytes-Rich Thrombi in Cerebral Large Vessel Occlusion Are Associated with Increased Stiffness and Poorer Revascularization Outcomes.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kévin PrematDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F75013, Paris, France. kevin.premat@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0705-176X
Agnes DechartresDepartement of Biostatistics, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, Public Health and Medical Information, F75013, Paris, France.
Stéphanie LenckDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F75013, Paris, France.
Eimad ShotarDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F75013, Paris, France.
Raphaël Le BoucDepartement of Vascular Neurology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, F75013, Paris, France.
Vincent DegosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, F75013, Paris, France.
Nader SourourDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F75013, Paris, France.
Sonia AlamowitchDepartement of Vascular Neurology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Saint Antoine Hospital, F75012, Paris, France.
Yves SamsonDepartement of Vascular Neurology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, F75013, Paris, France.
Frédéric ClarençonDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F75013, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMechanical thrombectomy (MT) failure is associated with very poor prognosis. Permanent intracranial stenting (PIS) may be useful in such refractory occlusions. However, this strategy requires an aggressive antithrombotic regimen that may be harmful in extended strokes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients with refractory acute large vessel occlusions (LVOs) treated by PIS versus patients for whom the procedure was stopped without recanalization.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review by searching for articles in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2015 to September 2019. Two reviewers independently selected studies comparing PIS after failed MT in addition to usual care versus usual care only. A comparative meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to estimate odds ratios of favorable clinical outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin scale 0-2, mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH).

resultsFour comparative studies were included for a total of 352 patients: 149 in the PIS group versus 203 in the control group. PIS was associated with significantly higher rates of 90-day favorable clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR], 2.87 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.77-4.66]; p < 0.001; I

conclusionFrom observational study results, attempting PIS after failed MT seems to improve clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of intracranial bleeding. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Indexed as

StentsCerebral RevascularizationConservative TreatmentEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial Arterial DiseasesNeuroimagingThrombectomyEndovascular recanalizationReperfusionStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID31927615
OpenAlexW2999344836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.