ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
8 versus 12 weeks of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and response predictors for overactive bladder.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2020Pooled it
- Review
- Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Detrusor Overactivity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy and sex-specific outcomes after six episodes of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatment on overactive bladder syndrome symptoms.Frontiers in urology · 2024Article
- Effect duration of the initial course of peroneal electrical Transcutaneous NeuroModulation in patients with overactive bladder.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
- Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation maintenance therapy for overactive bladder in women: long-term success rates and adherence.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe primary objective is to compare weekly success rates after 8 vs 12 weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) sessions for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in women and the secondary objective is to identify treatment response predictors.
methodsA retrospective study of 470 women was performed with the primary definition of success a Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) score of 1 ("very much better") or 2 ("much better") and a ≥ 10-point improvement in both subscales of the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OABq-SF). Additional analyses were performed to include a success definition of a PGI-I score of 3 ("a little better"). Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with response.
resultsOne hundred and thirty-six out of 470 (29%) discontinued treatment before 12 weeks. One hundred out of 334 (29.9%) were successes at 8 weeks vs 138 out of 334 (41.3%) at 12 weeks (p = 0.002). Including a PGI-I score of 3 as an indicator of success, 181 out of 334 (54.2%) at 8 weeks and 202 out of 334 (60.5%) at 12 weeks were successes (p = 0.10). Factors associated with treatment response were neurological disorder (OR 4.32 [1.10-16.04]), prolapse surgery history (OR 3.89 [1.12-14.49]), and vaginal estrogen use (OR 1.76 [1.01-3.08]). Recurrent UTI was associated with failure (OR 0.42 [0.21-0.86]).
conclusionsThe PTNS treatment success rate for OAB in women is greater at 12 weeks than at 8 weeks based on two validated questionnaires, the PGI-I and the OABq-SF. However, the success rates were equivalent if women who are "a little better" are also considered successes; with this definition, clinicians may consider shortening treatment duration to 8 weeks. Four clinical factors were significantly associated with response and may help to guide patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31927598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.