ArticleBone2020
MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.
Article in Bone, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Cohesive Extended Finite Element Modeling of Atypical Femoral Fracture.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Segmentation and finite element analysis in orthopaedic trauma.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- The Multifactorial Relationship Between Bone Tissue Water and Stiffness at the Proximal Femur.Calcified tissue international · 2025Article
- Model for Calculating Impact Force for Individualized Hip Fracture Prediction During a Fall.Advances in orthopedics · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging based finite element modelling of the proximal femur: a short-term in vivo precision study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Application of Advanced Bone Imaging Technologies in Sports Medicine.Radiology research and practice · 2023Review
- Prediction of osteoporosis from proximal femoral cortical bone thickness and Hounsfield unit value with clinical significance.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- Biomechanical models: key considerations in study design.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021Article
- Article
- Bone microarchitecture in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism.Bone reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Half of the women who sustain a hip fracture would not qualify for osteoporosis treatment based on current DXA-estimated bone mineral density criteria. Therefore, a better approach is needed to determine if an individual is at risk of hip fracture from a fall. The objective of this study was to determine the association between radiation-free MRI-derived bone strength and strain simulations compared to results from direct mechanical testing of cadaveric femora. Imaging was conducted on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner using two sequences: one balanced steady-state free precession sequence with 300 μm isotropic voxel size and one spoiled gradient echo with anisotropic voxel size of 234 × 234 × 1500 μm. Femora were dissected free of soft-tissue and 4350-ohm strain-gauges were securely applied to surfaces at the femoral shaft, inferior neck, greater trochanter, and superior neck. Cadavers were mechanically tested with a hydraulic universal test frame to simulate loading in a sideways fall orientation. Sideways fall forces were simulated on MRI-based finite element meshes and bone stiffness, failure force, and force for plastic deformation were computed. Simulated bone strength metrics from the 300 μm isotropic sequence showed strong agreement with experimentally obtained values of bone strength, with stiffness (r = 0.88, p = 0.0002), plastic deformation point (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001), and failure force (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). The anisotropic sequence showed similar trends for stiffness, plastic deformation point, and failure force (r = 0.68, 0.70, 0.84; p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.0006, respectively). Surface strain-gauge measurements showed moderate to strong agreement with simulated magnitude strain values at the greater trochanter, superior neck, and inferior neck (r = -0.97, -0.86, 0.80; p ≤0.0001, 0.003, 0.03, respectively). The findings from this study support the use of MRI-based FE analysis of the hip to reliably predict the mechanical competence of the human femur in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.