Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31926027›Full record

ArticleImmunology2020

Should we be more cre-tical? A cautionary tale of recombination.

Anna Andrusaite, Simon Milling

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna AndrusaiteInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Simon MillingInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4384-5516
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T030879/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cre-loxP system has been revolutionary in the field of immunology. The technology enables genetic deletion in mice with unprecedented precision. It is therefore now widely used to investigate gene functions in animal models of disease, and in fundamental studies of the immune response. This widespread adoption of cre-loxP technology has allowed a thorough investigation of its strengths and weaknesses. Here we highlight an important paper which not only describes potential problems with the commonly-used screening procedures used when identifying offspring of the correct genotype, but also describes how this screening can be improved to ensure that the right animals are produced.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsForkhead Transcription FactorsGenotypeGerm CellsIntegrasesMiceCre recombinaseForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp3 protein, mouseIntegrases

Identifiers

PMID31926027
PMCPMC6954702
OpenAlexW3000598146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.