Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925696›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Ecotoxicological study of six drugs in Aliivibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata.

Laura Lomba, David Lapeña, Natalia Ros, Elena Aso, Mariachiara Cannavò, Diego Errazquin, Beatriz Giner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ExploringAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ecotoxicity interspecies study of ionic liquids based on phosphonium and ammonium cations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura LombaUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain. llomba@usj.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-8138
David LapeñaUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Natalia RosUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena AsoUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Mariachiara CannavòDipartimento di scienze chimeche biologiche farmaceutiche ed ambientali, Università degli studi di Messina, viale F. Stagno D' alcontres 31, 98166, Messina, Italy.
Diego ErrazquinUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Beatriz GinerUniversidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autovia A23 km 299, 50830, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad San Jorge · ESUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Gobierno de Aragón E31_17R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of drugs in the environment is an emerging issue in the scientific community. It has been shown that these substances are active chemicals that consequently affect aquatic organisms and, finally, humans as end users. To evaluate the toxicity of these compounds and how they affect the environment, it is important to perform systematic ecotoxicological and physicochemical studies. The best way to address this problem is to conduct studies on different aquatic trophic levels. In this work, an ecotoxicological study of six drugs (anhydrous caffeine, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, gentamicin sulphate, lidocaine hydrochloride, tobramycin sulphate and enalapril maleate) that used three aquatic biological models (Raphidocelis subcapitata, Aliivibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna) was performed. Additionally, the concentration of chlorophyll in the algae R. subcapitata was measured. Furthermore, EC50 values were analysed using the Passino and Smith classification (PSC) method, which categorized the compounds as toxic or relatively toxic. All of the studied drugs showed clear concentration-dependent toxic effects. The toxicity of the chemicals depended on the biological model studied, with Raphidocelis subcapitata being the most sensitive species and Aliivibrio fischeri being the least sensitive. The results indicate that the most toxic compound, for all the studied biological models, was diphenhydramine hydrochloride. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

DaphniaWater Pollutants, ChemicalAliivibrio fischeriAnimalsAquatic OrganismsEcotoxicologyHumansWater Pollutants, ChemicalAliivibrio fischeriDaphnia magnaDose-responsePharmaceuticalsRaphidocelis subcapitata

Identifiers

PMID31925696
OpenAlexW2998843307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.