Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925551›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2020

Application of artificial neural networks for automated analysis of cystoscopic images: a review of the current status and future prospects.

Misgana Negassi, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola, Simon Hein, Arkadiusz Miernik, Alexander Reiterer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Classification of Coronavirus (COVID-19) from X-ray and CT images using shrunken features.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Misgana NegassiDepartment of Sustainable Systems Engineering INATECH, University of Freiburg, Emmy-Noether-Straße 2, Freiburg, Germany.
Rodrigo Suarez-IbarrolaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Hugstetter Str. 55, Freiburg, Germany.
Simon HeinDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Hugstetter Str. 55, Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Hugstetter Str. 55, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander ReitererDepartment of Sustainable Systems Engineering INATECH, University of Freiburg, Emmy-Noether-Straße 2, Freiburg, Germany. alexander.reiterer@ipm.fraunhofer.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0203A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal detection and surveillance of bladder cancer (BCa) rely primarily on the cystoscopic visualization of bladder lesions. AI-assisted cystoscopy may improve image recognition and accelerate data acquisition.

objectiveTo provide a comprehensive review of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and convolutional neural network (CNN) applications in cystoscopic image recognition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database to identify recent English literature relevant to ML, DL and CNN applications in cystoscopic image recognition. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, two articles and one conference abstract were identified addressing the application of AI methods in cystoscopic image recognition. These investigations showed accuracies exceeding 90% for tumor detection; however, future work is necessary to incorporate these methods into AI-aided cystoscopy and compared to other tumor visualization tools. Furthermore, we present results from the RaVeNNA-4pi consortium initiative which has extracted 4200 frames from 62 videos, analyzed them with the U-Net network and achieved an average dice score of 0.67. Improvements in its precision can be achieved by augmenting the video/frame database.

conclusionAI-aided cystoscopy has the potential to outperform urologists at recognizing and classifying bladder lesions. To ensure their real-life implementation, however, these algorithms require external validation to generalize their results across other data sets.

Indexed as

CystoscopyNeural Networks, ComputerForecastingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningCystoscopic imagesDeep learningMedical image analysisNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID31925551
PMCPMC7508959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.