Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925533›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

The validation of the Italian version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST).

Carla Ida Ripamonti, Francesca Chiesi, Patricia Di Pede, Mauro Guglielmo, Luisa Toffolatti, Laura Gangeri, Elena Allocca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measures of financial toxicity in cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Severity of Financial Toxicity for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Review
  11. Assessing suffering of patients on cancer treatment and of those no longer treated using ESAS-Total Care (TC).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Financial toxicity in female patients with breast cancer: a national cross-sectional study in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of financial toxicity and its associations with health-related quality of life and treatment non-adherence in Turkish cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  17. Identifying a cut-off score for the COST measure to indicate high financial toxicity and low quality of life among cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carla Ida RipamontiOncology Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-5054
Francesca ChiesiDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug, and Child's Health (NEUROFARBA), Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via S.Salvi 12 - Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy. francesca.chiesi@unifi.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-9219
Patricia Di PedeOncology Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Mauro GuglielmoOncology Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Luisa ToffolattiOncology Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Laura GangeriClinical Psychology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Elena AlloccaOncology Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFinancial toxicity (FT) is the unintended, potential economic harm or damage of oncologic treatments that has become a medical problem with political implications. To assess FT, the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire was developed. Since an Italian version is not available yet, we aimed to validate the Italian version of the COST questionnaire in a population of cancer patients during oncologic treatments or follow-up.

methodsA sample of Italian native outpatients were asked to fill the Italian version of the COST and five other self-administered questionnaires to assess quality of life, treatment-related symptoms, hope, distress, and unmet needs. Additionally, a subsample of patients was asked to retake the COST after 2-6 weeks.

resultsA single factor better represents the scale structure. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was provided and criterion validity was established, showing that financial toxicity predicts the patient's distress. Finally, known-groups validity was confirmed, testing the differences related to treatment-related expenses, sociodemographic characteristics, stage of the disease, and performance status.

conclusionThe current findings suggest the Italian version of the COST is a psychometrically sound scale that potentially offers an added value in assessing FT in patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealthcare FinancingHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsCancer patientsDistressFinancial burdenOncologic treatmentsPsychometric validationToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31925533
OpenAlexW2998805786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.