Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925521›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Predicting Intestinal Ischaemia in Patients with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Simple Score.

Mahdi Bouassida, Ghazi Laamiri, Slim Zribi, Helmi Slama, Bassem Mroua, Selim Sassi, Rania Aboudi, Mohamed Mongi Mighri, Khaled Bouzeidi, Hassen Touinsi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictive factors of bowel necrosis in patients with incarcerated femoral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mahdi BouassidaDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia. bouassidamahdi@yahoo.fr.
Ghazi LaamiriDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Slim ZribiDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Helmi SlamaDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Bassem MrouaDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Selim SassiDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Rania AboudiDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Mohamed Mongi MighriDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Khaled BouzeidiFaculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hassen TouinsiDepartment of Surgery, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIntestinal ischaemia (II) is the most critical factor to determine in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) because intestinal ischaemia could be reversible. The aim of this study was to create a clinicoradiological score to predict II in patients with ASBO.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study including 124 patients with ASBO. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors of II. We assigned points for the score according to the regression coefficient. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsSix independent predictive factors of II were identified: age, pain duration, body temperature, WBC, reduced wall enhancement and segmental mesenteric fluid at CT scan. According to the regression, coefficient points were assigned to each of the variables associated with II. The estimated rates of II were calculated for the total scores ranging from 0 to 24. The AUC of this clinicoradiological score was 0.92. A cut-off score of 6 was used for the low-probability group (the risk of II was 1.13%). A score ranging from 7 to 15 defined intermediate-probability group (the risk of II was 44%). A score ≥16 defined high-probability group (100% of patients in this group had II).

conclusionsWe performed a score to predict the risk of intestinal II with a good accuracy (the AUC of our score exceeded 0.90). This score is reliable and reproducible, so it can help surgeon to prioritize patients with II for surgery because ischaemia could be reversible, avoiding thus intestinal necrosis.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallLogistic ModelsMaleMesenteric IschemiaMesenteryMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.