ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Multilevel allometric modelling of maximum cardiac output, maximum arteriovenous oxygen difference, and peak oxygen uptake in 11-13-year-olds.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical approaches to account for muscle size when evaluating strength.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- School-based predictive contributors to six-minute walk test performance across pubertal stages: an explainable machine learning study in Tunisian adolescents.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Longitudinal development and tracking of cardiorespiratory fitness from childhood to adolescence.PloS one · 2024Article
- Hemoglobin Mass, Blood Volume and VOFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Pubertal Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Relation to Late Adolescent Body Fatness in Boys: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Influence of sex-specific concurrent changes in age, maturity status, and morphological covariates on the development of peak ventilatory variables in 10-17-year-olds.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Peak Oxygen Consumption During Exercise Testing Between Sexes Among Children and Adolescents in Taiwan.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Traditional and New Perspectives on Youth Cardiorespiratory Fitness.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposesTo investigate longitudinally (1) the contribution of morphological covariates to explaining the development of maximum cardiac output ([Formula: see text] max) and maximum arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO
methodsFifty-one (32 boys) 11-13-year-olds had their peak [Formula: see text], maximum heart rate (HR max), [Formula: see text] max, and a-vO
resultsThere were no sex differences in HR max which was not significantly (p > 0.05) correlated with age, morphological variables, or peak [Formula: see text]. The best-fit models for [Formula: see text] max and a-vO
conclusions(1) With FFM controlled for, there were no sex differences in [Formula: see text] max or a-vO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.