Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925496›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2020

SosA in Staphylococci: an addition to the paradigm of membrane-localized, SOS-induced cell division inhibition in bacteria.

Martin S Bojer, Dorte Frees, Hanne Ingmer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SroA links SigS-dependent stress signaling to metabolic remodeling inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene patterns ofEuropean journal of translational myology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Harmful behaviour through plasmid transfer: a successful evolutionary strategy of bacteria harbouring conjugative plasmids.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin S BojerDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-9593
Dorte FreesDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4946-2890
Hanne IngmerDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. hi@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-5631
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danmarks Grundforskningsfond DNRF120Teknologi og Produktion, Det Frie Forskningsråd 1337-00129 and 1335-00772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all living organisms, genome replication and cell division must be coordinated to produce viable offspring. In the event of DNA damage, bacterial cells employ the SOS response to simultaneously express damage repair systems and halt cell division. Extensive characterization of SOS-controlled cell division inhibition in Escherichia coli has laid the ground for a long-standing paradigm where the cytosolic SulA protein inhibits polymerization of the central division protein, FtsZ, and thereby prevents recruitment of the division machinery at the future division site. Within the last decade, it has become clear that another, likely more general, paradigm exists, at least within the broad group of Gram-positive bacterial species, namely membrane-localized, SOS-induced cell division inhibition. We recently identified such an inhibitor in Staphylococci, SosA, and established a model for SosA-mediated cell division inhibition in Staphylococcus aureus in response to DNA damage. SosA arrests cell division subsequent to the septal localization of FtsZ and later membrane-bound division proteins, while preventing progression to septum closure, leading to synchronization of cells at this particular stage. A membrane-associated protease, CtpA negatively regulates SosA activity and likely allows growth to resume once conditions are favorable. Here, we provide a brief summary of our findings in the context of what already is known for other membrane cell division inhibitors and we emphasize how poorly characterized these intriguing processes are mechanistically. Furthermore, we put some perspective on the relevance of our findings and future developments within the field.

Indexed as

SOS Response, GeneticsBacterial ProteinsCell DivisionCell MembraneSon of Sevenless ProteinsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusBacterial ProteinsSon of Sevenless ProteinsCell division inhibitionCtpADNA damageGram-positiveSosASOS responseStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID31925496
OpenAlexW2999143943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.