ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2020
[Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using an intramedullary locking nail].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transpedal Retrograde Recanalisation of a Dorsalis Pedis Artery Occlusion Associated With Arteriovenous Fistula After Combined Arthroscopic and Mini Open Talocalcaneotibial Arthrodesis.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
- Midshaft tibial osteotomy and bone transport for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Pedobarographic evaluation of five commonly used orthoses for the lower extremity.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Role of network cloud platform-based and progressive health education in postoperative rehabilitation of patients with tibial fracture.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveArthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) aims at reconstructing a pain-free, orthograde, and functional limb with reduced invasiveness and lower complication rates compared to open arthrodesis. INDICATIONS: Combined osteoarthritis of the ankle and subtalar joint or hindfoot malalignment. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Osteomyelitis/deep soft tissue infections, talus necrosis, severe deformity of hindfoot or distal tibia, pronounced boney defect, indication for combined total ankle replacement and subtalar fusion. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Patient in supine position; arthroscopic debridement of the cartilage and subchondral zone, perforation of the subchondral bone marrow of the ankle and subtalar joint. Foot and hindfoot positioning. Special attention has to be paid to the calcaneus and talus inclination, hindfoot alignment and rotation. Temporary fixation, insertion of the guide wire, reaming and insertion of the retrograde, curved compression arthrodesis nail. If needed, autologous bone grafting. Proximal locking of the nail, application of compression, distal locking, wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Lymphatic drainage, physical therapy, and restricted bed rest until wound healing. Non-weightbearing, immobilization for 8 weeks, then step-wise increase of weightbearing. Fitting of custom-made shoes.
resultsRetrospectively included were 15 patients treated by arthroscopic TTCA with an intramedullary nail (average age 56 ± 10 years, 93% male, all had risk factors for postoperative complications). Due to a preoperative plantar ulceration, 4 patients (27%) had 3 ± 1.8 conditioning operations. Sufficient hindfoot correction was achieved in all patients. Major complications occurred in 33% (non-unions). In a subgroup analysis, the presence of a plantar ulceration significantly influenced the development of a major complication. In a case-control study, major complications occurred in 63% and wound complications in 50% of patients for the open technique compared to 33% and 0%, respectively, for the arthroscopic technique. Although the current data do not prove superiority of arthroscopic TTCA compared to open TTCA, there appears to be a strong trend towards considerably lower complication rates following arthroscopic TTCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.