Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31925400›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Understanding chemical reactivity using the activation strain model.

Pascal Vermeeren, Stephanie C C van der Lubbe, Célia Fonseca Guerra, F Matthias Bickelhaupt, Trevor A Hamlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficient COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A neutral σNature chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Insights into Tetrazine-Benzene Cycloadditions.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radical Stability Paradox: Substituent Effects versus Heats of Formation.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition Reaction: Why Two Is Faster than One.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pascal VermeerenDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-6837
Stephanie C C van der LubbeDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Célia Fonseca GuerraDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F Matthias BickelhauptDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.m.bickelhaupt@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-7747
Trevor A HamlinDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.a.hamlin@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5128-1004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding chemical reactivity through the use of state-of-the-art computational techniques enables chemists to both predict reactivity and rationally design novel reactions. This protocol aims to provide chemists with the tools to implement a powerful and robust method for analyzing and understanding any chemical reaction using PyFrag 2019. The approach is based on the so-called activation strain model (ASM) of reactivity, which relates the relative energy of a molecular system to the sum of the energies required to distort the reactants into the geometries required to react plus the strength of their mutual interactions. Other available methods analyze only a stationary point on the potential energy surface, but our methodology analyzes the change in energy along a reaction coordinate. The use of this methodology has been proven to be critical to the understanding of reactions, spanning the realms of the inorganic and organic, as well as the supramolecular and biochemical, fields. This protocol provides step-by-step instructions-starting from the optimization of the stationary points and extending through calculation of the potential energy surface and analysis of the trend-decisive energy terms-that can serve as a guide for carrying out the analysis of any given reaction of interest within hours to days, depending on the size of the molecular system.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalCycloparaffinsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationThermodynamicsCycloparaffins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.