Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Impact of advanced radiotherapy techniques and dose intensification on toxicity of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

Natsuo Tomita, Kaoru Uchiyama, Tomoki Mizuno, Mikiko Imai, Chikao Sugie, Shiho Ayakawa, Masanari Niwa, Tooru Matsui, Shinya Otsuka, Yoshihiko Manabe and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiotherapy for Genitourinary Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Natsuo TomitaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan. c051728@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4601-0119
Kaoru UchiyamaDepartment of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, 5-15 Sumiyoshi-cho, Kariya, Aichi, 448-8505, Japan.
Tomoki MizunoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Mikiko ImaiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9 Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8650, Japan.
Chikao SugieDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9 Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8650, Japan.
Shiho AyakawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, JCHO Chukyo Hospital, 1-1-10 Sanjo, Minami-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 457-8510, Japan.
Masanari NiwaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, 1275-53 Yamanoue, Yasuzuka-cho, Suzuka, Mie, 513-0818, Japan.
Tooru MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Konan Kosei Hospital, 137 Oomatsubara, Takaya-cho, Konan, Aichi, 483-8704, Japan.
Shinya OtsukaDepartment of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, 3-1 Goshoai, Koryuji-cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8553, Japan.
Yoshihiko ManabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai Hospital, 171-1 Hokama, Yaese-cho, Shimajiri, Okinawa, 901-0493, Japan.
Kento NomuraDepartment of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan.
Takuhito KondoDepartment of Radiology, Narita Memorial Hospital, 134 Haneihonmachi, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8029, Japan.
Katsura KosakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, 1-1-1 Takaki-cho, Kasugai, Aichi, 486-8510, Japan.
Akifumi MiyakawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1, Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0001, Japan.
Akihiko MiyamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-0833, Japan.
Shinya TakemotoDepartment of Radiology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, 123-1 Mizukami-cho, Fujieda, Shizuoka, 426-8662, Japan.
Yuto KitagawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-2477
Yuta ShibamotoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPChukyo Hospital · JPFujieda Municipal General Hospital · JPHokuto Hospital · JPKariya Toyota General Hospital · JPKasugai Municipal Hospital · JPKonan Kosei Hospital · JPNagoya Medical Center · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOkazaki City Hospital · JPSuita Tokushukai Hospital · JPSuzuka University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of dose-escalated radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) remain unclear in salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy. We examined the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques and dose intensification on the toxicity of SRT. This multi-institutional retrospective study included 421 patients who underwent SRT at the median dose of 66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. IMRT and IGRT were used for 225 (53%) and 321 (76%) patients, respectively. At the median follow-up of 50 months, the cumulative incidence of late grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities was 4.8% and 24%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the non-use of either IMRT or IGRT, or both (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-5.4, p < 0.001) and use of whole-pelvic radiotherapy (HR 7.6, CI 1.0-56, p = 0.048) were associated with late GI toxicity, whereas a higher dose ≥68 Gy was the only factor associated with GU toxicities (HR 3.1, CI 1.3-7.4, p = 0.012). This study suggested that the incidence of GI toxicities can be reduced by IMRT and IGRT in SRT, whereas dose intensification may increase GU toxicity even with these advanced techniques.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyRadiation DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAgedAged, 80 and overGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyUrogenital System

Identifiers

PMID31924839
PMCPMC6954263
OpenAlexW2999830176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.