Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924729›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2020

Repeatability of Quantitative

Bernard H E Jansen, Matthijs C F Cysouw, André N Vis, Reindert J A van Moorselaar, Jens Voortman, Yves J L Bodar, Patrick R Schober, N Harry Hendrikse, Otto S Hoekstra, Ronald Boellaard and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Leveraging [Clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  5. Repeatability of semi-quantitative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight inMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Day-to-day variability of [EJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard H E JansenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands bh.jansen@amsterdamumc.nl.
Matthijs C F CysouwDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
André N VisDepartment of Urology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reindert J A van MoorselaarDepartment of Urology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jens VoortmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yves J L BodarDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick R SchoberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and.
N Harry HendrikseDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Otto S HoekstraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET scans may be used to monitor treatment response in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). To interpret longitudinal differences in PSMA uptake, the intrinsic variability of tracer uptake in PCa lesions needs to be defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of quantitative PET/CT measurements using

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLysineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsUrea2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido)pentanedioic acidLysineUrea18F-DCFPyLprostate cancerPSMArepeatability

Identifiers

PMID31924729
PMCPMC7456167
OpenAlexW2999238049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.