SynthesisBMJ open2020
Effectiveness of interventions targeting antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Resident-, prescriber-, and facility-level factors associated with antibiotic use in long-term care facilities: a systematic review of quantitative studies.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024Pooled it
- Nudge interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship in primary care: a systematic review and quality assessment.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interventions to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults (ImpresU): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in four European countries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Trial
- Antimicrobial use and stewardship activities in Swiss long-term care facilities: data from a national point-prevalence survey.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Nursing home nurses' opinion profiles on the potential evolution of their role in antimicrobial stewardship and associated factors: a national cross-sectional study in France.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial prescribing in French nursing homes and interventions for antimicrobial stewardship: a qualitative study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024Article
- Barriers to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities: a scoping review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Nurses' Anxiety Mediates the Relationship between Clinical Tolerance to Uncertainty and Antibiotic Initiation Decisions in Residential Aged-Care Facilities.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
- Article
- A practice guide on antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Review
- Feasibility of a placebo-controlled trial of antibiotics for possible urinary tract infection in care homes: a qualitative interview study.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Hospital Pharmacists' Viewpoint on Quality Use of Antibiotics and Resistance: A Qualitative Exploration from a Tertiary Care Hospital of Quetta City, Pakistan.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Trends in and Risk Factors for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection, New Haven County, Connecticut, USA, 2015-2020.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Review
- Nursing home residents' experiences and perceptions of antibiotic use: A qualitative descriptive study.American journal of infection control · 2023Article
- Exploring Antimicrobial Stewardship Influential Interventions on Improving Antibiotic Utilization in Outpatient and Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Feasibility of a Nursing Home Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere are high levels of inappropriate antibiotic use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Our objective was to examine evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce antibiotic use and/or inappropriate use in LTCFs.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from 1997 until November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled and uncontrolled studies in LTCFs measuring intervention effects on rates of overall antibiotic use and/or appropriateness of use were included. Secondary outcomes were intervention implementation barriers from process evaluations. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently applied the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group's resources to classify interventions and assess risk of bias. Meta-analyses used random effects models to pool results.
resultsOf include studies (n=19), 10 had a control group and 17 had a high risk of bias. All interventions had multiple components. Eight studies (with high risk of bias) showed positive impacts on outcomes and included one of the following interventions: audit and feedback, introduction of care pathways or an infectious disease team. Meta-analyses on change in the percentage of residents on antibiotics (pooled relative risk (RR) (three studies, 6862 residents): 0.85, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.18), appropriateness of decision to treat with antibiotics (pooled RR (three studies, 993 antibiotic orders): 1.10, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.91) and appropriateness of antibiotic selection for respiratory tract infections (pooled RR (three studies, 292 orders): 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.40), showed no significant intervention effects. However, meta-analyses only included results from intervention groups since most studies lacked a control group. Insufficient data prevented meta-analysis on other outcomes. Process evaluations (n=7) noted poor intervention adoption, low physician engagement and high staff turnover as barriers.
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence that interventions employed to date are effective at improving antibiotic use in LTCFs. Future studies should use rigorous study designs and tailor intervention implementation to the setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.