Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924558›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2020

A Qualitative Evaluation of Double Up Food Bucks Farmers' Market Incentive Program Access.

Jennifer A Garner, Casey Coombs, Mateja R Savoie-Roskos, Carrie Durward, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Food is Medicine Initiative for Mitigating Food Insecurity in the United States.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Looking beyond the Lamppost: Population-Level Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer A GarnerSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; John Glenn College of Public Affairs, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Jennifer.Garner@osumc.edu.
Casey CoombsDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Mateja R Savoie-RoskosDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Carrie DurwardDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExplore factors affecting access to and use of Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB), a farmers' market program that doubles Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for use toward the purchase of fruits and vegetables (FV).

designFocus groups.

settingMetro and nonmetro counties in Utah and western Upstate New York.

participantsNine groups composed of 62 low-income adults (3-9/group). PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: Satisfaction with, barriers to, and facilitators of program use; suggestions for improvement. ANALYSIS: Transcribed verbatim and coded thematically in NVivo 11 software according to template analysis.

resultsProgram satisfaction was high and driven by FV affordability, perceived support of local farmers, positive market experiences, and high-quality FV. Primary barriers to using DUFB were lack of program information and inconvenient accessibility. Insufficient program communication was a consistent problem that elicited numerous suggestions regarding expansion of program marketing. Emergent topics included issues related to the token-based administration of DUFB and debate regarding stigma experienced during DUFB participation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that although DUFB elicits many points of satisfaction among users, program reach may be limited owing to insufficient program marketing. Even among satisfied users, discussion of barriers was extensive, indicating that program reach and impact may be bolstered by efforts to improve program accessibility.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFruitVegetablesAdultFarmersFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNew YorkUtahfarmers’ market incentivesfood assistancefruitSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Programvegetables

Identifiers

PMID31924558
PMCPMC7338242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.