Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924278›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2020

Precision cut lung slices: a novel versatile tool to examine host-pathogen interaction in the chicken lung.

Karen Jane Bryson, Damien Garrido, Marco Esposito, Gerry McLachlan, Paul Digard, Catherine Schouler, Rodrigo Guabiraba, Sascha Trapp, Lonneke Vervelde

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Local photo-crosslinking of native tissue matrix regulates cell function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Jane BrysonDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. karen.bryson@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-5583
Damien GarridoINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR ISP, Centre Val de Loire, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Marco EspositoDivision of Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK.
Gerry McLachlanDivision of Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK.
Paul DigardDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK.
Catherine SchoulerINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR ISP, Centre Val de Loire, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Rodrigo GuabirabaINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR ISP, Centre Val de Loire, 37380, Nouzilly, France. rodrigo.guabiraba-brito@inra.fr.
Sascha TrappINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR ISP, Centre Val de Loire, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Lonneke VerveldeDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK.
Roslin Institute · GBUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 2015-67015-23093Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004219/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M028208/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M028305/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20002172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The avian respiratory tract is a common entry route for many pathogens and an important delivery route for vaccination in the poultry industry. Immune responses in the avian lung have mostly been studied in vivo due to the lack of robust, relevant in vitro and ex vivo models mimicking the microenvironment. Precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) have the major advantages of maintaining the 3-dimensional architecture of the lung and includes heterogeneous cell populations. PCLS have been obtained from a number of mammalian species and from chicken embryos. However, as the embryonic lung is physiologically undifferentiated and immunologically immature, it is less suitable to examine complex host-pathogen interactions including antimicrobial responses. Here we prepared PCLS from immunologically mature chicken lungs, tested different culture conditions, and found that serum supplementation has a detrimental effect on the quality of PCLS. Viable cells in PCLS remained present for ≥ 40 days, as determined by viability assays and sustained motility of fluorescent mononuclear phagocytic cells. The PCLS were responsive to lipopolysaccharide stimulation, which induced the release of nitric oxide, IL-1β, type I interferons and IL-10. Mononuclear phagocytes within the tissue maintained phagocytic activity, with live cell imaging capturing interactions with latex beads and an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Finally, the PCLS were also shown to be permissive to infection with low pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Taken together, immunologically mature chicken PCLS provide a suitable model to simulate live organ responsiveness and cell dynamics, which can be readily exploited to examine host-pathogen interactions and inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsLipopolysaccharidesLungPoultry DiseasesVeterinary MedicineLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID31924278
PMCPMC6954617
OpenAlexW2999825397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.