Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924194›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same.

Janette Mugavin, Sarah MacLean, Robin Room, Sarah Callinan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janette MugavinCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia. J.Mugavin@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0537-6392
Sarah MacLeanCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Robin RoomCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Sarah CallinanCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship NAAustralian Rechabite Foundation Top-up Scholarship NADiscovery Early Career Research Award, Australian Research Council DE180100016Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol consumption, even at low-levels, can not be guaranteed as safe or risk free. Specifically, the 2009 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council drinking guidelines recommend that adults should not drink more than two standard drinks on any day on average, and no more than four drinks on a single occasion. Nearly 40% of Australians aged 12 years and older drink alcohol but don't exceed these recommended limits, yet adult low-risk drinkers have been largely overlooked in Australian alcohol survey research, where they are usually grouped with abstainers. This paper examines the socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinking adults (18+ years old), compared to those who abstain.

methodsData from the 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey were used. In the past 12 months, 4796 Australians had not consumed alcohol and 8734 had consumed alcohol at low-risk levels, accounting for both average volume and episodic drinking (hereafter low-risk).

resultsMultivariate logistic regression results indicated that low-risk drinkers were more likely to be older, married, Australian-born, and reside in a less disadvantaged neighbourhood compared with abstainers. There was no significant difference by sex between low-risk drinkers and abstainers.

conclusionsThe socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinkers differed from that of abstainers. Combining low-risk drinkers and abstainers into a single group, which is often the practice in survey research, may mask important differences. The study may support improved targeting of health promotion initiatives that encourage low-risk drinkers not to increase consumption or, in view of increasing evidence that low-risk drinking is not risk free, to move towards abstinence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol AbstinenceAlcohol DrinkingAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAbstinenceAdultsCross-sectional dataLow-risk drinkingSocio-demographics

Identifiers

PMID31924194
PMCPMC6954507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.