Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924179›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2020

Assessing and reducing PET radiotracer infiltration rates: a single center experience in injection quality monitoring methods and quality improvement.

Dustin R Osborne, Shelley N Acuff, Michael Fang, Melissa D Weaver, Yitong Fu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Application of micro-bolus injection and piezoelectric sensors to improve the safety of radiopharmaceuticals bolus injection].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dustin R OsborneUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA. dosborne@utmck.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-5464
Shelley N AcuffUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Michael FangUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Melissa D WeaverUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Yitong FuUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Alcoa (United States) · USUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful injection of radiolabeled compounds is critical for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. A poor quality injection limits the tracer availability in the body and can impact diagnostic results. In this study, we attempt to quantify our infiltration rates, develop an actionable quality improvement plan to reduce potentially compromised injections, and compare injection scoring to PET/CT imaging results.

methodsA commercially available system that uses external radiation detectors was used to monitor and score injection quality. This system compares the time activity curves of the bolus relative to a control reading in order to provide a score related to the quality of the injection. These injection scores were used to assess infiltration rates at our facility in order to develop and implement a quality improvement plan for our PET imaging center. Injection scores and PET imaging results were reviewed to determine correlations between image-based assessments of infiltration, such as liver SUVs, and injection scoring, as well as to gather infiltration reporting statistics by physicians.

resultsA total of 1033 injections were monitored at our center. The phase 1 infiltration rate was 2.1%. In decision tree analysis, patients < 132.5lbs were associated with infiltrations. Additional analyses suggested patients > 127.5 lbs. with non-antecubital injections were associated with lower quality injections. Our phase 2 infiltration rate was 1.9%. Comparison of injection score to SUV showed no significant correlation and indicated that only 63% of suspected infiltrations were visible on PET/CT imaging.

conclusionsDeveloping a quality improvement plan and monitoring PET injections can lead to reduced infiltration rates. No significant correlation between reference SUVs and injection score provides evidence that determination of infiltration based on PET images alone may be limited. Results also indicate that the number of infiltrated PET injections is under-reported.

Indexed as

Decision TreesDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansInjectionsMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyQuality ImprovementRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticalsInfiltrationInjection qualityPETPositron emission tomographyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31924179
PMCPMC6954558
OpenAlexW3003832503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.