Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31924161›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Custom selected reference genes outperform pre-defined reference genes in transcriptomic analysis.

Karen Cristine Gonçalves Dos Santos, Isabel Desgagné-Penix, Hugo Germain

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selection and Validation of qRT-PCR Reference Genes inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reference Gene Stability inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen Cristine Gonçalves Dos SantosDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada.
Isabel Desgagné-PenixDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada.
Hugo GermainDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada. Hugo.Germain@uqtr.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-6194
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CA

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/435870-2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA sequencing allows the measuring of gene expression at a resolution unmet by expression arrays or RT-qPCR. It is however necessary to normalize sequencing data by library size, transcript size and composition, among other factors, before comparing expression levels. The use of internal control genes or spike-ins is advocated in the literature for scaling read counts, but the methods for choosing reference genes are mostly targeted at RT-qPCR studies and require a set of pre-selected candidate controls or pre-selected target genes.

resultsHere, we report an R-based pipeline to select internal control genes based solely on read counts and gene sizes. This novel method first normalizes the read counts to Transcripts per Million (TPM) and then excludes weakly expressed genes using the DAFS script to calculate the cut-off. It then selects as references the genes with lowest TPM covariance. We used this method to pick custom reference genes for the differential expression analysis of three transcriptome sets from transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing heterologous fungal effector proteins tagged with GFP (using GFP alone as the control). The custom reference genes showed lower covariance and fold change as well as a broader range of expression levels than commonly used reference genes. When analyzed with NormFinder, both typical and custom reference genes were considered suitable internal controls, but the custom selected genes were more stably expressed. geNorm produced a similar result in which most custom selected genes ranked higher (i.e. were more stably expressed) than commonly used reference genes.

conclusionsThe proposed method is innovative, rapid and simple. Since it does not depend on genome annotation, it can be used with any organism, and does not require pre-selected reference candidates or target genes that are not always available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGenes, EssentialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionHousekeeping genes for qPCRNext-generation sequencingR script

Identifiers

PMID31924161
PMCPMC6954607
OpenAlexW3006143259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.