ArticleNeuropharmacology2020
Differential effects of HDAC inhibitors on PPN oscillatory activity in vivo.
Article in Neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Acylation Modifications in Sleep Disorders: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- Histone Deacetylases and Immediate Early Genes: Key Players in Psychostimulant-Induced Neuronal Plasticity.Neurotoxicity research · 2021Review
- Optogenetic stimulation of glutamatergic neurons in the cuneiform nucleus controls locomotion in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) has long been known to be part of the reticular activating system (RAS) in charge of arousal and REM sleep. We previously showed that in vitro exposure to a HDAC Class I and II mixed inhibitor (TSA), or a specific HDAC class IIa inhibitor (MC 1568), decreased PPN gamma oscillations. Given the lack of information on systemic in vivo treatments on neuronal synaptic properties, the present study was designed to investigate the systemic effect of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) on PPN rhythmicity. Rat pups were injected (acute, single dose) with TSA (4 or 20 mg/kg), MC1568 (4 or 20 mg/kg), or MS275 (20 or 100 mg/kg). Our results show that MC1568 (20 mg/kg) reduced mean frequency of PPN oscillations at gamma band, while increasing mean input resistance (Rm) of PPN neurons. For TSA (4 and 20 mg/kg), we observed reduced mean frequency of oscillations at gamma band and increased mean Rm of PPN neurons. Systemic administration of 20 mg/kg MC1568 and TSA effects on Rm were washed out after 60 min of in vitro incubation of PPN slices, suggesting an underlying functional recovery of PPN calcium-mediated gamma band oscillations over time. In addition, at a lower dose, 4 mg/kg, MC1568 and TSA induced higher mean amplitude gamma oscillations. Blocking HDAC class I might not have deleterious effects on gamma activity, but, more importantly, the inhibition of HDAC class I (at 100 mg/kg) increased gamma band oscillations. In conclusion, the present results in vivo validate our previous findings in vitro and further expand information on the effects of HDAC inhibition on PPN rhythmicity. PPN neurons require normal activity of HDAC class IIa in order to oscillate at gamma band.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.