Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31923178›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.

Alison Beauchamp, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Annie Cooper, Vicki Pridmore, Patricia Livingston, Matthew Scanlon, Melissa Davis, Jonathan O'Hara, Richard Osborne

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Translation approaches to support systemic anti-cancer therapy consent for individuals with limited English proficiency.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using Codesign to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention to Improve the Accessibility and Acceptability of Cardiac Services: The Equal Hearts Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alison BeauchampDepartment of Medicine-Western Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-6200
Mohammadreza MohebbiBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-7211
Annie CooperBreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Vicki PridmoreBreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0858-0981
Patricia LivingstonFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Matthew ScanlonBreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Melissa DavisBreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Jonathan O'HaraFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4121-7519
Richard OsborneFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-2699
Deakin University · AUBreastscreen Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipation in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Australia is approximately 54% among the general population, but screening among women from some culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds is lower. BreastScreen Victoria apply strategies to increase screening including reminder letters and phone calls; however, these are usually provided in English. Using intervention strategies generated from the Ophelia (OPtimise HEalth LIteracy and Access) community co-design process, translated mammography reminder letters and in-language phone calls were tested within two randomised control trials (RCTs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women aged 50-75 years who were due for their 2-yearly screening mammography (for RCT#1) or were under-screened, i.e. ≥27 months since last screen (for RCT#2) were randomised into intervention or control groups. RCT#1 compared sending women routine reminder letters (English only) with translated (Arabic or Italian) letters. RCT#2 compared reminder telephone calls to women in their preferred language (Arabic or Italian) to no telephone call. The primary outcome for each trial was screening booking rates within 14-days. Primary outcomes were tested using Pearson's chi-square test. Rates within language group (incidence ratio: IR) were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

resultsFor RCT#1 (letters) 1,032 women were randomised into the intervention arm or to usual care. Uptake of screening bookings was similar between both groups, with no differences observed by language group. For RCT#2 (phone calls), 195 women were randomised to the intervention group or to usual care. Overall, 64.2% of women in the intervention arm and 6% in the control arm booked a screening appointment within 14 days (p<0.0001). The IR (95%CI) of booking was 10.1 (3.9, 26.3) times higher among Italian women, and 11.6 (2.9, 46.5) times higher among Arabic women in the intervention compared to usual care groups. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionA service improvement initiative derived from community members and breast screen providers was found to be highly effective. This evidence informed the service provider, BreastScreen Victoria, who have implemented these improvements into routine practice to improve screening among CALD groups and reduce health inequalities.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesCommunicationLanguageMammographyReminder SystemsTelephoneAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31923178
PMCPMC6953872
OpenAlexW3000415968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.