Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31923138›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use Among Cisgender Men Who Have Sex With Men and Use Methamphetamine in 3 Western US Cities.

Vanessa M McMahan, Courtney Moreno, Alia Al-Tayyib, Timothy W Menza, Edwin Roberto Orellana, Amisha Bhattarai, Joanne D Stekler, Sara N Glick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Methamphetamine Use among Young Sexual Minority Men: The P18 Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa M McMahanFrom the Department of Medicine, University of Washington.
Courtney MorenoHIV/STD Program, Public Health - Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA.
Alia Al-TayyibDenver Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO.
Timothy W MenzaHIV/STD/TB Program, Center for Public Health Practice, Oregon Public Health Division.
Edwin Roberto OrellanaPortland State University, Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland, OR.
Amisha BhattaraiPortland State University, Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland, OR.
Joanne D Stekler
Sara N Glick
University of Washington · USPortland State University · USDenver Health Medical Center · USOregon Health Authority · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

Interventions to Improve the HIV PrEP Cascade among Methamphetamine UsersR34DA045620 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEKLER, JOANNE DONNA · 2017 to 2019
$699k
Washington State National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS)U62PS005094 · PS · WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH · PI JAENICKE, THOMAS HENEAGE · 2016 to 2016
$108k
National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System (NHBS)U62PS005073 · PS · COLORADO STATE DEPT/PUB HLTH & ENVIRONMT · PI MATTSON, MELANIE · 2016 to 2016
$104k
National HIV Behavioral Surveillance ProjectU62PS005087 · PS · PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES · PI SCHAFER, SEAN · 2016 to 2016
$103k
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS005073NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS005087NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS005094NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA045620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) who use methamphetamine are at substantial risk for HIV and can benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

methodsWe used data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance 2017 survey from Seattle, WA; Portland, OR; and Denver, CO, to estimate PrEP awareness and use in the past 12 months among MSM who use methamphetamine. We then compared these estimates with participants who do not use methamphetamine but meet other criteria for PrEP use (i.e., condomless anal sex or a bacterial sexually transmitted infection). We explored reasons for not using PrEP and challenges using PrEP.

resultsOf the 1602 MSM who participated in the 2017 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance survey in Seattle, WA; Portland, OR; and Denver, CO, 881 met the inclusion criteria for this study, of whom 88 (10%) reported methamphetamine use in the past 12 months. Most (95%) participants had heard of PrEP, and 35% had used it in the past 12 months. Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness was lower among MSM who used methamphetamine (P = 0.01), but use was not different (P = 0.26). Among those who had not used PrEP, the most common reason for not using it was not thinking one's HIV risk was high enough (51%). Men who have sex with men who used methamphetamine were more likely to report that they were not sure PrEP would prevent them from getting HIV (38% vs. 19%, P = 0.002).

conclusionsThese results highlight the need for continued efforts to educate and promote PrEP uptake among MSM, particularly those who use methamphetamine.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultColoradoDrug UsersHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMethamphetamineOregonSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesWashingtonMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID31923138
PMCPMC7071950
OpenAlexW3000171319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.