Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31923133›Full record

SynthesisSpine2020

Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Lumbar Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Shichao Liu, Yinqing Wang, Zeyan Liang, Maochao Zhou, Chunmei Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of low-dose Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shichao LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yinqing Wang
Zeyan Liang
Maochao Zhou
Chunmei Chen
Grant Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designThis is a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (RhBMP) and autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: RhBMP has been emphasized in lumbar fusion due to high fusion success rate. However, ICBG remains the criterion standard graft approach for lumbar fusion. The safety and effectiveness of rhBMP are controversial.

methodsProspective randomized controlled trials were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails by using Medical Subject Headings terms "bone morphogenetic protein,' "bone transplantation,' and "spinal fusion.' Two independent investigators screened eligible studies, assessed the bias of original articles, extracted data including fusion success, Oswestry disability index improvement, improved short form 36 questionnaire scores, adverse events and re-operation, and a subgroup analysis. The GRADE approach was used to grade quality of evidence.

resultsTwenty randomized controlled trials (2185 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There were higher fusion success rate (odds ratio [OR] 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-7.63, P = 0.0002), better improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference 1.54, 95% CI 0.18-2.89, P = 0.03), and lower re-operation rate (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, P = 0.0007) in rhBMP group. Heterogeneity was obvious in fusion success rate (I = 58%); hence, a subgroup analysis, based on protein type (rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7), was performed, which suggested that only rhBMP-2 was better than ICBG for lumbar fusion. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between rhBMP and ICBG (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70-1.18, P = 0.47).

conclusionIn lumbar fusion, rhBMP-2 exhibited a higher fusion success rate and reduced the risk of re-operation. No difference in complication rate is between rhBMP (rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7) and ICBG. We suggest rhBMP especially rhBMP-2 as an effective substitute for ICBG for lumbar fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Indexed as

AdultAutograftsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone TransplantationFemaleHumansIliumLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsReoperationBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Proteinsrecombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2Recombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID31923133
PMCPMC7282484
OpenAlexW2999843849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.