SynthesisChinese medical journal2020
Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor-T cells in the treatment of B cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Chinese medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell in the treatment of hematologic malignancy: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Adverse effects in hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Cardiovascular effects associated with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Cytarabine on Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- A bibliometric and knowledge-map study on the treatment of hematological malignancies with CAR-T cells from 2012 to 2023.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- CAR-T in cancer therapeutics and updates.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024Article
- Clinical analysis of immune reconstitution after chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- The pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CAR-T cell therapy-related adverse reactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- G-CSF does not worsen toxicities and efficacy of CAR-T cells in refractory/relapsed B-cell lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Article
- Application of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies.BioMed research international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional treatment has limited efficacy in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. Since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) technology has shown high safety and results in high remission rates, we investigated its efficacy and safety in B-cell lymphoma treatment and analyzed potential affecting factors to provide evidence for therapeutic strategies and applications.
methodsWe searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to July 2019. Meta-analysis 1 was conducted to study the efficacy of CAR-T cell for treating B-cell lymphoma, measuring the response rate and complete remission rate as outcomes. Sub-group analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, and conditioning chemotherapy. Meta-analysis 2 was undertaken on the safety of the treatment with the incidence rate of toxicity (cytokine-releasing syndrome [CRS], neurotoxicity) as an outcome.
resultsSeventeen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. It was found that CAR-T cells had good therapeutic effects in the following cases: B-cell lymphoma (patients ≥65 years old); diffuse large B-cell lymphoma pathological type; patients with treatment target antigen other than CD19; patients treated with co-stimulatory molecules other than CD28, including 4-1BB+CD28 or 4-1BB; and patients treated with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine pre-treatment protocol conditioning chemotherapy. Although the CRS and neurotoxicity incidences were high, most were reversible with minimal risk of death.
conclusionCAR-T cell treatment is safe for clinical application; however, toxicity effects should be monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.