Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31923100›Full record

Observational studyChinese medical journal2020

Status of glycosylated hemoglobin and prediction of glycemic control among patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in North China: a multicenter observational study.

Jiao Wang, Meng-Yang Wang, Hui Wang, Hong-Wei Liu, Rui Lu, Tong-Qing Duan, Chang-Ping Li, Zhuang Cui, Yuan-Yuan Liu, Yuan-Jun Lyu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chinese medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiao WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Meng-Yang WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Hong-Wei LiuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Rui LuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Tong-Qing DuanDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Chang-Ping LiDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Zhuang CuiDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Yuan-Yuan LiuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Yuan-Jun LyuDepartment of Endocrinology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood glucose control is closely related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prognosis. This multicenter study aimed to investigate blood glucose control among patients with insulin-treated T2DM in North China and explore the application value of combining an elastic network (EN) with a machine-learning algorithm to predict glycemic control.

methodsBasic information, biochemical indices, and diabetes-related data were collected via questionnaire from 2787 consecutive participants recruited from 27 centers in six cities between January 2016 and December 2017. An EN regression was used to address variable collinearity. Then, three common machine learning algorithms (random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], and back propagation artificial neural network [BP-ANN]) were used to simulate and predict blood glucose status. Additionally, a stepwise logistic regression was performed to compare the machine learning models.

resultsThe well-controlled blood glucose rate was 45.82% in North China. The multivariable analysis found that hypertension history, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease history, exercise, and total cholesterol were protective factors in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control, while central adiposity, family history, T2DM duration, complications, insulin dose, blood pressure, and hypertension were risk factors for elevated HbA1c. Before the dimensional reduction in the EN, the areas under the curve of RF, SVM, and BP were 0.73, 0.61, and 0.70, respectively, while these figures increased to 0.75, 0.72, and 0.72, respectively, after dimensional reduction. Moreover, the EN and machine learning models had higher sensitivity and accuracy than the logistic regression models (the sensitivity and accuracy of logistic were 0.52 and 0.56; RF: 0.79, 0.70; SVM: 0.84, 0.73; BP-ANN: 0.78, 0.73, respectively).

conclusionsMore than half of T2DM patients in North China had poor glycemic control and were at a higher risk of developing diabetic complications. The EN and machine learning algorithms are alternative choices, in addition to the traditional logistic model, for building predictive models of blood glucose control in patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseChinaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulin

Identifiers

PMID31923100
PMCPMC7028203
OpenAlexW2998145447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.