Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31923054›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2020

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals.

Paulo Borem, Rita de Cássia Sanchez, Jacqueline Torres, Pedro Delgado, Ademir Jose Petenate, Daniel Peres, Gareth Parry, Ana Pilar Betrán, Pierre Barker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulo BoremInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, Massachusetts; Departamento Materno Infantil, Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein, São Paulo, and Agencia Nacional de Saude Suplementar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; and the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rita de Cássia Sanchez
Jacqueline Torres
Pedro Delgado
Ademir Jose Petenate
Daniel Peres
Gareth Parry
Ana Pilar Betrán
Pierre Barker
World Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate a quality improvement (QI) initiative designed to increase the frequency of vaginal delivery in Brazilian hospitals.

methodsTwenty-eight hospitals enrolled in a 20-month (May 2015-December 2016) Breakthrough Series Collaborative that used QI methods to increase implementation of obstetric approaches with potential to increase the frequency of vaginal delivery. All hospitals contributed qualitative data for iterative redesign. Thirteen intervention hospitals with complete data contributed to an analysis of changes in vaginal delivery in a targeted population over time. Hospitals from the São Paulo region (five intervention and eight nonintervention) contributed to a comparator analysis of changes in vaginal delivery for all deliveries over time.

interventionMost hospitals targeted low-risk pregnancies in primiparous women, delivered by hospital-employed obstetricians or admitted through emergency departments, and some included all pregnant women. The collaborative tested four interventions to increase vaginal delivery: 1) coalition building of stakeholders with the common purpose of ensuring "appropriate delivery," 2) empowering pregnant women to choose their preferred mode of delivery, 3) implementation of new care models favoring physiologic birth, and 4) improved information systems for continuous learning by health care providers.

resultsFor 119,378 targeted deliveries (36% of all deliveries) in 13 intervention hospitals, vaginal delivery increased from 21.5% in 2014 to 34.8% in 2016, a relative increase of 1.62 (95% CI 1.27-2.07, P<.001). In the comparator analysis, vaginal delivery for all deliveries in the five São Paulo intervention hospitals increased from 16.1% to 23% (RI 1.43, P<.001) and from 11.0% to 13.0% (relative rate ratio 1.18, P<.001) in the eight nonintervention São Paulo hospitals. The relative increase in vaginal delivery between the São Paulo intervention and nonintervention groups was 1.21 (95% CI 1.05-1.41, P=.01). The rate of maternal adverse events and neonatal intensive care unit admissions for newborns who weighed at least 2,500 g did not differ significantly during the observation period.

conclusionsKey interventions implemented with QI methods were associated with increased vaginal delivery. This approach may help address the global cesarean delivery epidemic.

Indexed as

BrazilDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID31923054
PMCPMC7012340
OpenAlexW2999961687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.